Anambah Rise is a three-stage development by CPG Estates of 97 new housing lots in the Maitland City Council constituency adjacent to both the Hunter River and Anambah Lagoon. This development is in one of New South Wales’ fastest-growing regions, with a wide range of retail, commercial and community spaces.
CPG Estates engaged Orion as the construction-phase superintendent and principles’ representative.
- Review of the contractor’s quality assurance and project management system to ensure compliance with contractual requirements and completion of pre-commencement processes.
- Assess the contractor’s program, extensions of time, RFIs, variations and monthly progress claims and issue the appropriate directions, certificates, and letters.
- Inspect the site twice weekly, monitor the contractor’s progress against the program, chair fortnightly meetings, and stakeholder engagement.
- Issue certificates for practical completion and upon completion of the defect’s liability period.
Challenges arose from a combination of site conditions: excess topsoil, water-adverse material (Alluvium) and prolonged periods of wet weather. These factors impacted the suitability of materials for re-use according to the original geotechnical reports, the overall balance of onsite cut/fill, and the ongoing accessibility for construction. This resulted in lodgement of multiple challenging contractor variations.
Other challenges included:
- Requirement for additional scope of works, such as external sewer and electrical infrastructure upgrades.
- Poor weather and difficulty in completing construction resulted in an extension to duration of works.
As Superintendent, Orion’s role was:
- Defining the extent of variations and sorting them into manageable and measurable stages of work. The contractor prioritised immediate site access as part of the construction approach. Consequently, the project was divided into multiple stages, leading to several variations. Orion’s task was to outline necessary inclusions and the cost for each variation
- Assessing and communicating the contract rates. Allowing the contractor to proceed with onsite works during favourable weather, bypassing delays caused by uncertainties such as ground condition investigations and price variation.
- Ensuring the geotechnical advice was followed by monitoring construction activity and inspecting issues on site.
- Verifying the contractor’s submitted quantities through a first-principles assessment using onsite test pits and a detailed breakdown of quantities street by street and area by area. This process promptly ensured the integrity of the Bill of Quantities (BOQ), preventing the inclusion of both the original contract quantities and additional rates intended to cover the entire process of win, load, haul, spread, compact, and testing operations.
Orion maintained clear communication about the project’s progress with the client, enabling the client to understand, assess and make decisions based on an overall risk vs reward perspective. This approach also ensured the contractor stayed aligned with the project’s progression and facilitated smooth payment processes for both parties, particularly during persistently challenging conditions such as adverse weather.
We also:
- Used contract rates to guarantee the client maintained the commercial integrity established during the tender period. This removed the need for additional supervisory site monitoring or assessment of ongoing activities against potential variations.
- Helped minimise potential excess materials and identified areas for re-use, reducing the risk of unnecessary offsite hauling expenses. This was particularly valuable to the client, considering the scarcity of materials.
- Managed the cost, tracking and assessment of work completed to provide the client with insights into how the variation proposal aligned with the original design. This also gave the client a clear view of where the contractor completed necessary and unnecessary excavation works in specific sections of the project.
- Provided the client with confidence in the quantities and rates of the initial cost estimates, which allowed risk visibility and early cost-benefit outcomes of the proposed remediation work, as opposed to learning of a lump sum after completion of the works.
Superintendency & Principles Representative